← ALL EVENTS
HIGH CONFIDENCEBLIND SPOTFIRST OBSERVED 8 MONTHS AGO

Rep. Nancy Pelosi discloses trade(s) in AB, GOOGL, AMZN, AAPL, NVDA

Nancy Pelosi (CA11) disclosed 17 transactions, traded Dec 24 – Jan 16: 9 purchases and 7 sales.

TradedTickerCompanyActionAmountOwner
Jan 16ABAllianceBernstein Holding L.P. UnitsBuy$1,000,001 - $5,000,000Spouse
Jan 16GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Buy$500,001 - $1,000,000Spouse
Jan 16AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.Buy$500,001 - $1,000,000Spouse
Jan 16NVDANVIDIA CorporationBuy$250,001 - $500,000Spouse
Jan 16VSTVistra Corp.Buy$100,001 - $250,000Spouse
Jan 2VSNTVersant Media Group, Inc.Exchange$15Spouse
Dec 30GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Buy$250,001 - $500,000Spouse
Dec 30GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Sell (partial)$1,000,001 - $5,000,000Spouse
Dec 30AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.Buy$100,001 - $250,000Spouse
Dec 30AAPLApple Inc.Buy$250,001 - $500,000Spouse
Dec 30AAPLApple Inc.Sell (partial)$5,000,001 - $25,000,000Spouse
Dec 30NVDANVIDIA CorporationBuy$100,001 - $250,000Spouse
Dec 30PYPLPayPal Holdings, Inc.Sell$250,001 - $500,000Spouse
Dec 30DISWalt Disney CompanySell$1,000,001 - $5,000,000Spouse
Dec 24AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.Sell (partial)$1,000,001 - $5,000,000Spouse
Dec 24AAPLApple Inc.Sell (partial)$5,000,001 - $25,000,000Spouse
Dec 24NVDANVIDIA CorporationSell (partial)$1,000,001 - $5,000,000Spouse

ORIGINAL FILING ↗ALL FILINGS BY NANCY PELOSI →CONGRESS TRADES DASHBOARD →

Amounts are the ranges members report. Rows are read automatically from the filing; a trade split across a page break can be missed, so the original filing is the full record.

What This Means

Pelosi filed a financial disclosure covering stock transactions in five major companies spanning technology and healthcare sectors. Her trading activity is subject to public disclosure under congressional financial reporting rules. Such disclosures can draw scrutiny regarding timing relative to legislative activity or committee work, though disclosure alone does not indicate impropriety or market-moving information.

Sources — 1 tier

Every claim below links directly to the original reporting it was drawn from. Penblock synthesizes and cross-references these sources — it doesn't originate the reporting.

How This Could Play Out — recorded when first flagged, not updated

Resolve

UNLIKELY

If scrutiny of the disclosure timing leads to legislative action on congressional trading restrictions (e.g., strengthened STOCK Act enforcement or insider-trading-adjacent rules), it could create regulatory clarity that reduces perceived information asymmetry in tech-sector equities, though the effect would likely be modest and diffuse across the affected holdings.

Left Unattended

LIKELY

The disclosure is filed and public; absent a specific allegation of impropriety or legislative response, markets would plausibly treat this as routine congressional financial reporting with no direct bearing on the fundamentals or near-term valuations of the underlying tech and healthcare stocks.

Escalate

POSSIBLE

If media or watchdog scrutiny identifies a pattern of trades timed suspiciously close to committee votes, legislative announcements, or material non-public information, it could fuel broader debate over congressional trading practices and put downward pressure on sentiment toward large-cap tech stocks perceived as frequent targets of insider-trading concerns.

SPONSORED

Confidence History

  • HIGH CONFIDENCEOct 1, 2026 at 12:02 PM

    Legally mandated financial disclosure filing -- primary source, not a report about the event