Rep. August Lee Pfluger II discloses trade(s) in UHALB, DMLP, EPD, KRP, VNOM
August Lee Pfluger II (TX11) disclosed 6 transactions, traded Mar 13: 6 purchases and 0 sales.
| Traded | Ticker | Company | Action | Amount | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13 | UHALB | Amerco - Series N Non-Voting | Buy | $15,001 - $50,000 | Self |
| Mar 13 | BRK.B | Investment Berkshire Hathaway Inc. New | Buy | $15,001 - $50,000 | Self |
| Mar 13 | DMLP | Investment Dorchester Minerals, L.P. - Common Units Representing Limited Partnership Interests | Buy | $15,001 - $50,000 | Self |
| Mar 13 | EPD | Investment Enterprise Products Partners L.P. | Buy | $15,001 - $50,000 | Self |
| Mar 13 | KRP | Investment Kimbell Royalty Partners Common Units Representing Limited Partner Interests | Buy | $15,001 - $50,000 | Self |
| Mar 13 | VNOM | Investment Viper Energy, Inc. | Buy | $15,001 - $50,000 | Self |
ORIGINAL FILING ↗ALL FILINGS BY AUGUST LEE PFLUGER II →CONGRESS TRADES DASHBOARD →
Amounts are the ranges members report. Rows are read automatically from the filing; a trade split across a page break can be missed, so the original filing is the full record.
What This Means
A U.S. House member has filed a financial disclosure covering transactions in energy infrastructure and materials stocks. The holdings span midstream energy (DMLP, EPD), uranium (UHALB), and other commodity-linked positions. Congressional trading disclosures are public record and can signal legislative priorities or sector exposure among policymakers with influence over energy and commodity regulation.
Sources — 1 tier
Every claim below links directly to the original reporting it was drawn from. Penblock synthesizes and cross-references these sources — it doesn't originate the reporting.
- August Lee Pfluger IIOct 3, 2026Rep. August Lee Pfluger II discloses trade(s) in UHALB, DMLP, EPD, KRP, VNOM ↗
How This Could Play Out — recorded when first flagged, not updated
Resolve
UNLIKELYIf these disclosures trigger formal ethics review or legislative action to restrict congressional trading in energy assets, it could create regulatory uncertainty for midstream and commodity sectors, though enforcement mechanisms are historically weak.
Left Unattended
LIKELYThese trades remain routine congressional disclosures with no follow-up scrutiny or policy response, leaving the underlying positions and sector exposure to evolve based on market fundamentals rather than political intervention.
Escalate
POSSIBLEIf media or watchdog groups amplify conflict-of-interest narratives around a Texas representative holding energy infrastructure stakes while voting on energy policy, it could intensify calls for trading restrictions and create reputational pressure on energy-linked equities.
SPONSORED
Confidence History
- HIGH CONFIDENCEOct 3, 2026 at 12:03 AM
Legally mandated financial disclosure filing -- primary source, not a report about the event